But if you tame me… Part 1

Despite the worldwide quarantines and lockdowns, work in wildlife centres has not stopped. Animals still get injured and sick, and now that it is springtime, the first orphaned animals are arriving at our centre. The only difference for us is that we have even fewer resources than before. We have to make sure our volunteers stay healthy and safe. Gloves, face masks and disinfectant are now needed for corona patients, so it is hard to buy them anymore, and as the economy is not very stable in these times, people are not able to donate money.

But our work continues and we do our best to keep it going as professional wildlife centres are needed. We can not expect the knowledge, resources and professionalism of private individuals to take care of injured, sick or orphaned wildlife. Often well-intended acts end in tragedies, for humans and the wild animal.

I already stressed before, that even the quietest wild animal is stressed in human care. We might not see it, hear it or notice it in any way but they are stressed. As wild animals are not domesticated, they are not, even if they are raised by humans, bred and genetically modified to live in captivity and close proximity with humans. Through domestication, humans changed wild animals to be more manageable for human use and to be more suited to learn how to interact and communicate with humans.

As we raise orphaned wildlife regularly in wildlife centres and often, as there are not many foster animal-parents available, these orphans are raised by humans. We all know how fast young animals, across all species, learn and adapt. And sometimes these orphans think of us humans as their parents or kind, especially if they are raised alone and with frequent interactions with humans.

 Imprinting is the term we use in these situations. Konrad Lorenz was one of the first researchers to show the effects of imprinting, and I am sure a lot of you have seen pictures of him with a clutch of geese following him around. Usually, a young animal imprints on their own species, as they see, hear and feel their parents and siblings. This process helps them to know which species is their own kind, which species is safe to interact with, and how their future mate should look, sound, smell and so on. We can differentiate social imprinting and sexual imprinting. A nonhuman animal can be social with its own species and humans but show sexual behaviour, if given a choice, only to its own kind.

When and how this imprinting happens is different in every species. We don’t know much about our wildlife yet, and therefore not how the orphaned animals are affected by being raised in close proximity to humans.

Many centres apply different strategies for preventing the human-imprinting process. Some use hand-puppets in the shape of the parents to feed the young ones, others feed the orphans in darkness.

All rehabilitators usually avoid any close contact and any human voices around the nonhuman animals. It is always preferred to have more than one individual of a particular species, to simulate the presence of siblings if the species allows it (obviously species where only one offspring is raised, would not be used to having siblings around, and it might end in a fight, like a lot of eagles where the older hatchling kills the younger one). But studies suggest that even having a sibling there is not necessarily enough to prevent developing tameness or a positive relationship with the human feeding them, which might lead to sexual imprinting.

Raising an orphaned wildling is quite a science. And still, we don’t know enough to prevent human imprinting and as we lack the ability to recheck our released animals, due to a lack of resources, we can not see if they successfully mate with their own species.

Further studies are needed to determine what is the best approach for raising orphaned wildlife, especially songbirds as here the methods to prevent imprinting are very limited. We can not feed them in the dark, there are too many species for which to have individual puppets and sometimes siblings are not available.

To be continued…

They don’t look stressed…do they?!

When I open any of the social media platform apps on my phone, I often see pictures of some wild animal held into the camera with the report or description of how it was ‘saved’ by somebody great. (I know that some clever person wrote this nice algorithm that figures out that I am interested in wildlife in general 😊.) Don’t get me wrong I am happy about any wildlife in need get help. But what we as humans, who live with no real predators to fear, often forget, is that those wild animals are terrified of being picked up, grabbed, held up high into a camera by the world’s most feared predator, us.

I know, I know! Often, they don’t seem to mind, but wildlife is very good at hiding any weakness, as they are desperately debating about the best option, fight or flight?! The handling causes them high-stress levels, which are energy consuming, negative for any healing process and is often totally unnecessary. And then there are the baby animal pictures, yes these are much more relaxed and don’t seem to fear the human (or even worse in some cases, the dog or cat) anymore. That is because they are IMPRINTED!!!

Sorry for shouting there. But this is really a hot topic. Imprinted means that they see the human (cat, dog…) as a social or even a sexual partner. They don’t see them as a threat or a danger. Does that sound like a wild animal to you? Probably not. Often, they cause a lot of problems as they grow up and can’t be released, so those imprints live in captivity which isn’t the goal of wildlife rehabilitation and they take up resources which another animal needs. Even if they are released, they often seek out humans or domestic animals and endanger themselves or others with that kind of behaviour.

A lot of you might wonder “what harm is it if a squirrel is a bit tame and plays with the dogs in the city park or visits a playground?” Well, not all dogs lost their hunting instinct and might use the squirrel as a chew toy and not all mothers appreciate if a squirrel climbs over their toddler and steels the snacks. What if this squirrel gets a fright or a bit too frustrated and bites one of the children there? Not so funny anymore. What to do then, does it need to be removed (which is just a bit of greenwashing for getting killed)? Well, it might be a bit exaggerated on my part now, but it has happened before with hand-raised crows and foxes.

Hopefully, you get my point. The goal of wildlife rehabilitation is to release a healthy animal back into the wild. Healthy includes them being able to find their appropriate food, recognize the proper sexual partner and reproduce and show appropriate fear of dangers, like people, domestic animals, cars, etc.

So why the rant about this? Well, because of more and more social media groups of wildlife ‘rescue’ groups. Especially here in the country, I am working in, we don’t have many big (or even small) wildlife rehabilitation centres. So, a lot of groups, little NGOs form and want to help wildlife. Which is fine, but I want to show that wildlife rehabilitation should mainly be done by professionals, people who have learned the appropriate skills, people who have gone to, and learned from, other wildlife rehabilitation centres,  and ecologists, biologists, vet techs, or veterinarians with special knowledge about wildlife. There are so many things that can go wrong, which in the end will cost the wild animal its life.

So even wild animals don’t show it; they are constantly stressed while they are in care. The wildlife centres I visited have their own strategies to reduce this stress as much as possible. The injured animals are separated in enclosures, designed to keep them safe and give them enough space to feel comfortable. No humans walk by constantly and there is absolutely no contact with domestic animals. There are no loud noises, and with orphaned animals, there are techniques used to prevent them from seeing you as a food source (if they are likely to imprint). Contact is kept to a minimum and for longer procedures animals are sometimes sedated …

Just to mention a few! So, you see, a layperson at home might struggle to offer all that. But not all wildlife rescue places are great either.

We lack the opportunity to build a profession in this sector. We need to improve.

Found on Flckr, despite it might look not as natural, please wear gloves when handling wild animals, for their and your sake
Abcnews.go.com, this squirrel lost all fear from cats, the next step closer is being inside the cat…

Abc.net.au, again, I get that we all need the likes and shares to get more donations, but to stress an animal and risk your safety, is not worth it. And what kind of picture do we share with the public? That foxes are pets? That it is ok to have a wild animal that close to my face?

Veitshoechheim-blog.de, absolut stressed kite held in the camera. If you need to do an exam be quick and choose a location where it is not as stressful. If an animal looks that stressed, I would postpone the exam if possible. At least one of them is wearing leather gloves. Often you see pictures of people handling birds of prey and owls with no safety measurements. Not good to share with the public!

https://www.vin.com/vetzinsight/default.aspx?pid=756&id=5454945 an example in the U.S. that squirrels are not pets and what can happen if you want to release them

https://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/vetrec/172/8/211.full.pdf example about stress in wildlife

https://lafeber.com/vet/basic-wildlife-rehabilitation-triage/ Dr. Schott talks about important considerations in wildlife rehabilitation

https://www.wildtierhilfe-wien.at/wildtierpflege-und-unserioese-webauftritte/ Biologist and Head of a local NGO here in Vienna BSc E. Moser-Gattringer just wrote an article about the topic in german

The beauty in everything…

If you think of parasites, most people automatically wrinkle their nose in disgust. Normal reaction, I think. You are not supposed to like a parasite. Parasites live of another being without giving anything back. (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/parasite) Thankfully most parasites don’t kill their host. But be aware, they don’t do that out of the good of their heart, it just would not benefit them to let their host die. Selfish little things. But aren’t we all a bit selfish, sometimes? It seems there is no reason to like them or not to be disgusted and affronted by parasites. Don’t worry I am not trying to make you like them. Most time of my job (ya, it really feels like most time) I am working on killing or at least reducing the number of parasites in or on an animal. They are rarely the cause of a serious illness in a wild animal, but they don’t help the animal to get better. And obviously, if you keep animals in a shelter, you don’t want it swamped over by all kinds of parasites. But maybe, just maybe we can pause for a second and just think about the life of a parasite. The struggle to find a host, to fight for their place on or in the host, to go through a sometimes very complex life cycles. And even some of them are, in their own little way a bit beautiful. Like these feather mite eggs on a pigeon. Unfortunately, the picture doesn’t do them justice, as in real-time they sparkle like tiny diamonds in their off-white colour. Of course, the pidgeon got treated as the infestation was severe in this case and mites are really not something you want in a shelter. But it helps in a busy day to just stop yourself and look for the beauty in something simple and maybe not obvious.

Feather mite eggs

An uninvited Guest

Skin sample of a hedgehog

This time of year it is not unusual to find hedgehogs in your garden that are looking for a nice place for hibernation. To prepare for this time, hedgehogs need to eat a lot and gain weight. Sometimes it happens that hedgehogs, which were born a bit later in the year, struggle to accumulate the necessary fat storage. In all that stress and trouble their immune system fails to cope with things like ectoparasites, which are usually not a big deal. Mites are one example of ectoparasites. The little hedgehog, of which I took the skin sample, was found by very observant wildlife enthusiasts. The little guy hasn’t reached its needed weight yet and got some skin lesions (Dermatitis). The sample shows Caparinia mites that live on the skin of the hedgehog. At the moment it is still unclear if the hedgehog has an additional fungal infection of the skin, as mites can be carriers of those.

Skin sample of a hedgehog